Legal Opinion

Kardonsky v. Tozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying motion to strike out portions of complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to serve answer within twenty days upon payment of costs. There are three separate appeals printed in one record. In taxing disbursements they should be divided into three parts, one-third to each appeal. Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. We think that the examination sought in advance of service of answer is…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of CarllNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  2. Etter v. Early Foundry Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Punia v. Dry Dock Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of BaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  5. Abels v. Rubin, New York County Courts1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API