Legal Opinion

Roth v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 15, 2003No. 00-638CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Senior Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This military pay ease is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment based upon the administrative record. Defendant’s motion supra is also filed in the alternative raising a RCFC 12(b)(4)1 motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Mr. Roth, the plaintiff herein, has properly pleaded statutory and regulatory violations by the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (“AFBCMR”) that are both justiciable and remediable in this court, therefore defendant’s motion to dismiss is…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Daniel A. Lindsay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. David C. Roth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Santiago v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Santiago v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Colon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API