Legal Opinion

NAES Corp. v. SCI 3.2, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 29, 2020No. A165158PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

684 Argued and submitted September 28, 2018, affirmed April 29, petition for review denied August 27, 2020 ( 366 Or 826) In the Matter of the Compensation of William H. Lodge, Claimant. NAES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SCI 3.2, INC. and William H. Lodge, Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board 1504600, 1502155; A165158

465 P3d 246

Employer, NAES Corporation, seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding it responsible for claimant’s hearing loss instead of claimant’s most recent employer, SCI 3.2, Inc., under the last injurious exposure rule (LIER). NAES argues…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. SAIF Corp. v. JanuaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Taylor v. SAIF Corp. (In re Taylor)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Beneficiaries of the Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum Motorwerks, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Foster Wheeler Corp. v. MarbleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bruntz-Ferguson v. Liberty Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Miles v. Bi-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API