Legal Opinion
Taylor v. SAIF Corp. (In re Taylor)
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 5, 2018No. A162892PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
*420*200Claimant seeks judicial review of a final order of the Workers' Compensation Board (board) in which the board concluded that $8,000 was a reasonable award of attorney fees for services rendered by claimant's attorney in proceedings seeking rescission of the denial of his claim. Because the board's order lacks substantial reason, we lack a sufficient basis to meaningfully review the board's exercise of discretion. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reconsideration.
Our review is confined to the relevant facts in the administrative record, ORS 183.482(7), which are undisputed here.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Schoch v. Leupold & StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Walker v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Hamilton v. Pacific Skyline, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Long v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Peabody v. Saif Corp. (In re Comp. of Peabody)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Staveland and FisherOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- Taylor v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Cascade in Home Care, LLC v. Hooks (In re Comp. of Hooks)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- NAES Corp. v. SCI 3.2, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.