San Francisco National Bank v. American National Bank of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Thos. F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
The plaintiff placed a draft with the defendant for collection, the defendant forwarded the draft to a bank at Arizona for collection, which bank collected the draft, failed, and no part of the proceeds has ever reached any of the parties hereto. The action was tried by the court on an agreed statement of facts; judgment was rendered therein for plaintiff, from which judgment the defendant appeals.
The agreed statement of facts, in part, is as follows: The Judson Dynamite and Powder Company, of San Francisco, held a check, dated December 17, 1903, on the Sandoval Na*409tional Bank of Nogales,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mills v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- PRESIDENT AND DIRECTORS OF THE BANK OF WASHINGTON v. Triplett & NealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Sahlien v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. NewlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
- Davis v. First National Bank of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Miller v. Germain Seed & Plant Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Retsloff v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Luckehe v. First Nat. Bk. of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Nicoletti v. Bank of Los BanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Security Etc. Bk. v. Southern Etc. Bk.California Court of Appeal · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.