Legal Opinion

Smith v. Diplock

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 12, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

The issue between the parties in this case is as to the character of a transfer of property.

The parties for several years had each owned ninety-nine of the two hundred shares of a corporation engaged in the business of retailing furniture and one-half, in common and undivided, of the store used in the business and the lot on which it stands, in Augusta.

The defendant had been in the business for thirty-four years, and engaged in the real estate business for twenty-five years at time of hearing.

In 1921, the Wallace Diplock Co., a corporation, was formed, Mrs. Diplock and Mrs. Smith each holding…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Campbell v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Horn v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. MacAuley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Coyle v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rouillard v. Tardiff (In Re Tardiff)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1984
  2. Braddock v. McBurnieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  3. Seaman v. SeamanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. US BANK TRUST NA v. YEATONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API