Smith v. Diplock
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
The issue between the parties in this case is as to the character of a transfer of property.
The parties for several years had each owned ninety-nine of the two hundred shares of a corporation engaged in the business of retailing furniture and one-half, in common and undivided, of the store used in the business and the lot on which it stands, in Augusta.
The defendant had been in the business for thirty-four years, and engaged in the real estate business for twenty-five years at time of hearing.
In 1921, the Wallace Diplock Co., a corporation, was formed, Mrs. Diplock and Mrs. Smith each holding…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Campbell v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Horn v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- MacAuley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Coyle v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rouillard v. Tardiff (In Re Tardiff)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1984
- Braddock v. McBurnieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
- Seaman v. SeamanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- US BANK TRUST NA v. YEATONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020