Seaman v. Seaman

SCOLNIK, Justice.

The plaintiff, Earle Seaman, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, York County, ordering the defendant, Malcolm Seaman, be allowed to redeem his interest in a cottage which was the subject of an equitable mortgage held by the plaintiff. The defendant cross-appeals, assigning error to the court’s calculation of the amount due to effectuate the redemption. We grant the defendant’s cross-appeal, and remand for recalculation of the mortgage debt, but affirm the judgment of the Superior Court in all other respects.

The facts are not in dispute. Between 1962 and 1964 the…