Legal Opinion

Braddock v. McBurnie

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 13, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.

This was a bill in equity seeking to establish that a deed under which defendant asserted title to real estate was in fact an equitable mortgage. The justice below so found and fixed the terms of redemption. Before us are defendant’s exceptions, first to the refusal of the justice below to make certain requested supplemental findings, and second to the final decree.

“Many times the Court has reiterated the rule that an excepting party, if he would obtain any benefit from his exceptions, must set forth enough in the bill of exceptions to *40enable the Court to determine that the points raised are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
  2. Usen v. UsenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  3. Emery v. BradleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1896
  4. American Oil Co. v. CarlisleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  5. Smith v. DiplockSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rouillard v. Tardiff (In Re Tardiff)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1984
  2. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. TUTTLEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API