Clarence Stephan v. United States of America, Bernard Marchesani v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
These are consolidated appeals from a denial of motions to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.
Appellants, Marchesani and Stephan, were convicted at a jury trial of conspiracy to use extortionate means in attempting to collect an extension of credit in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894. Marchesani was also convicted of the substantive offense. These convictions were affirmed in all respects in a decision reported at 457 F.2d 1291 (6th Cir. 1972).
These appeals raise the following issues: 1) Is 18 U.S.C. § 891 et seq. an unconstitutional exercise of the commerce and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Frank James Stevens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Milton J. Largent, United States of America v. Jonathon B. HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Orejuela, JulioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Marvin Mulligan and Melvin MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Beamon v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.