Legal Opinion

Clarence Stephan v. United States of America, Bernard Marchesani v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 26, 1974No. 73-1959 and 73-1960PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Per curiam

These are consolidated appeals from a denial of motions to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.

Appellants, Marchesani and Stephan, were convicted at a jury trial of conspiracy to use extortionate means in attempting to collect an extension of credit in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894. Marchesani was also convicted of the substantive offense. These convictions were affirmed in all respects in a decision reported at 457 F.2d 1291 (6th Cir. 1972).

These appeals raise the following issues: 1) Is 18 U.S.C. § 891 et seq. an unconstitutional exercise of the commerce and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Frank James Stevens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Milton J. Largent, United States of America v. Jonathon B. HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Orejuela, JulioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Marvin Mulligan and Melvin MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  5. Beamon v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API