Douglas v. State

OPINION

STEWART, Judge.

Ty S. Douglas was convicted of two counts of first-degree sexual assault and two counts of fourth-degree assault. 1 Douglas argues that several of the court’s trial rulings require reversing his convictions. But Douglas has not convinced us that any of the rulings he attacks constitute reversible error.

Douglas next argues that the prosecutor’s final argument created plain error. But we are not convinced that the potential error was obvious to a competent lawyer or judge without objection or that, if error, it was so substantially prejudicial that failing to correct it…