Legal Opinion
Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 25, 1925No. 3271, 3273, 3275, 3285, 3317PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
These suits were brought for the purpose of enjoining, setting aside, aiid annulling an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission relating to the distribution of coal cars among bituminous coal mines in times of car shortage. On March 22, 1921, the Commission instituted an investigation, upon its own motion, into and concerning the reasonableness and propriety of the then existing ear distribution rules, in so far as they apply to privately owned eoal cars and ears furnished for railroad fuel coal, with a view to prescribing such just and reasonable rule or…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Idaho Maryland Mines Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Central Eureka Mining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Jaimie Davis v. Curtis J. Sathre, III; WFP Securities Corporation; John Evan Schooler; Thomas Hanson; and Warren HorneyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Michael H. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2026
- Ramirez v. BisignanoDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025