Legal Opinion

State v. Furman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 4, 2000No. CX-99-892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Rex Furman, who received a ten-year conditional-release term as part of his sentence, contends it should have been for a five-year term. He argues that the trial court could not consider his 1981 conviction because imposition of sentence for that crime was stayed. We affirm the trial court’s conclusion that the 1981 conviction remains a “conviction” for purposes of the conditional-release statute.

FACTS

Appellant was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct on January 13, 1999. He had been convicted of fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct in 1981, but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. MoonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. State v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API