Legal Opinion

DiGIROLAMO v. Apanavage

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1973No. Appeal, 100PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. J ustice Eagen,

Sarah DiGirolamo was injured in an automobile accident while riding as a passenger in a vehicle operated by Anthony R. Apanavage. At the time she was unmarried and a minor. Approximately one year later she married Anthony Apanavage. Subsequently, as Sarah DiGirolamo Apanavage [appellant], she instituted this action against her husband, Anthony R. Apanavage [appellee] seeking damages in excess of f l 0,000, alleging he had “operated his motor vehicle in such a careless and negligent manner as to cause . . . extensive personal injuries to the body of the [appellant]…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Willcox v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Sensenig v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Meisel v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hack v. HackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Lusby v. LusbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Estate of GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Bozman v. BozmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Winn v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API