Legal Opinion

Lane v. McEachern

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 11, 1968No. 18801PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

At issue in this action for a declaratory judgment, instituted by the respondent Lane, is the title to a tract of land situated in Charleston County, such land being referred to in the record as “The Property,” title thereto being claimed by Lane and the State.

The Property is situated on the east side of the Edisto River (formerly known as Pon Pon or Pon Pond River), which at the point is a fresh water navigable river, but also tidal in that the water level is affected by the ebb and flow of the salt water tide in and out of the mouth of the river. The Property, in its natural state, was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cape Romain Land & Imp. Co. v. Ga.-Car. Canning Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hobonny Club, Inc. v. McEachernSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  2. Lowcountry Open Land Trust v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. HOLSTON LAND COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Conch Creek Corp. v. GuessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. GriffithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API