Legal Opinion
Hobonny Club, Inc. v. McEachern
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 14, 1979No. 20884PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a quiet title action instituted by respondent (Ho-bonny) to extinguish a cloud on its title to Hobonny Plantation arising out of a claim by the State of South Carolina to all tidelands within the boundaries of the plantation. The State answered and counterclaimed asserting title to the tidelands in dispute. The matter came before the lower court on a motion for summary judgment by Hobonny. The lower court rendered judgment in favor of Hobonny from which the State has appealed. Wé affirm.
Hobonny Plantation lies in Beaufort County, adjacent to the Combahee River, Hobonny Creek and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Carolina Land Company, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- State v. HardeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
- Cape Romain Land & Imp. Co. v. Ga.-Car. Canning Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. HassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Kiawah Development Partners v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Bennett v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Fuller-Ahrens Partnership v. S.C. Deparment of Highways & Public TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Query v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.