Legal Opinion

State v. Griffith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 14, 1975No. 20061PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This action involves the conflicting claims of the State of South Carolina (appellant) and Jack W. Griffith (respondent) to, an area of tidelands, approximately 59 acres, adjacent to Wappoo Creek in Charleston County, the area having been in Berkeley County in colonial times. Respondent’s claim of title to such tidelands rest solely upop a grant from the Lords Proprietors in the year 1717 to a grantee under whom respondent claims. Appellant contends that no grant relied upon by respondent conveyed such tidelands and that the title thereto remains in the State. Upon trial, and at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HardeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  2. Cape Romain Land & Imp. Co. v. Ga.-Car. Canning Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Lane v. McEachernSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  4. Conch Creek Corp. v. GuessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Yelsen Land Company, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API