Legal Opinion
Santiago v. Becton Dickinson & Co., S. A.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided May 27, 1982No. Civ. 78-1603PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CEREZO, District Judge.
This is an action for recovery of damages suffered in an employment related activity. Federal jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. Defendants Becton Dickinson & Co. S. A., American Cyanamid Co. (ACC), Sandoz Inc. and Colors and Chemicals Division of Sandoz Inc. (Sandoz) 1 have filed motions for summary judgment alleging that the actions of certain plaintiffs are time barred. Codefendants ACC and San-doz specifically claim that the actions of all plaintiffs are time barred since the amended pleading substituting them for John Doe defendants…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Marjorie Marie Valedon Martinez v. Hospital Presbiteriano De La Comunidad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- In re Guadalupe DíazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2001
- Brennan v. Lermer Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1986
- Ramirez Pomales v. Becton Dickinson & Co., SADistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1986
- Ocasio Ortiz v. Betancourt LebronDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.