Cleveland Paper Co. v. Banks
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to tbe district court foi Douglas county. Tried below before Neville, J. cited Cropsey v. Averill, 8 Neb., 160.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover the sum of $213.48 and interest, for paper alleged. to have been sold by the plaintiff to the defendant. The answer is a general denial. On the trial of the cause the jury returnéd a verdict in favor of the defendant, upon which judgment was rendered.
The errors assigned are: 1st. Misconduct of the prevailing party. 2d. That the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. 3d. Errors of law occurring at the trial.
The testimony shows that in October, 1879, one Smith, the secretary of the Omaha Post Printing Company, applied to one…
2Cited by27 opinions
- Bradshaw v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Huber v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KelloggNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Cooper v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.