Legal Opinion

Cooper v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1931No. 27372PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The plaintiff in error, R. T. Cooper, who will hereinafter be designated as defendant, was charged with forging the name of “George Vana” on the back of three checks and with uttering the three forgeries. He was convicted of the three forgeries, but was found not guilty of uttering the forged indorsements. At the time of the alleged offenses and for a number of years prior thereto, the defendant was employed by Black Brothers Milling Company, as agent and manager of their elevator at De Witt. As such agent and manager he had authority to buy grain and to pay for the same with their checks,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hall v. RiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Cleveland Paper Co. v. BanksNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Bourne v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Parker v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Jackson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Pierce v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API