Legal Opinion

STATE, BY & THROUGH ST. FORESTER v. Estremado

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1980No. 78-2981-L-2, CA 14582PublishedCited by 4 opinions

RICHARDSON, J.

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

The state in this civil action contends that defendant 1 failed to make every reasonable effort to extinguish a forest fire and that, consequently, it is liable for the state’s cost of abating the fire. ORS 477.066(1); ORS 477.068(1). At the close of the evidence in a trial to a jury, the court granted defendant’s motion for directed verdict and entered judgment thereon. The state appeals, assigning as error the order directing a verdict for defendant.

ORS 477.066(1) imposes a duty to fight forest fires. It provides:

"Each owner and operator of forest land on which a fire exists or from which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. GourleyOregon Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cruz v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Leibrecht v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Forestry v. Jepson & Sons Logging Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. State v. Columbia Basin Electric Co-op, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API