Legal Opinion

Chalmers v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 16, 1996No. 95-891Published

1Opinion of the Court

935 S.W.2d 258 (1996)

326 Ark. 895

Hugh CHALMERS, et al., Appellants,

v.

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 95-891.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

December 16, 1996.

David M. Hargis, Little Rock, for appellant.

David L. Williams, Little Rock, for Gulf States Toyota.

Max Hendrick, III, Steven A. Wood, Houston, TX, David M. Powell, Little Rock, Stephen G. Morrison, Columbia, SC, for Toyota Motor Sales.

ROAF, Justice.

The appellants filed suit against the appellees for breach of contract, breach of implied contractual covenants of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, interference of contract,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chalmers v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Lane v. LaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Wilson v. General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Tullock v. EckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API