Legal Opinion

Foveaux v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 4, 1992No. 67,963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larson, J.:

This appeal questions the trial court’s discretion in limiting participation of the attorneys for a personal injury protection (PIP) insurance carrier in an automobile negligence action and the award of attorney fees to the insured’s counsel.

On February 4, 1989, Carol L. Foveaux was involved in an automobile accident with Cassandra L. Smith, which resulted in Colonial Insurance Company of California paying Foveaux $12,886.59 in PIP benefits.

Foveaux did not sue Smith within 18 months after the date of the accident. Therefore, pursuant to K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 40-3113a(e), Colonial sued…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  3. Hoffman v. HaugSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. Nitchals v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Clinton F. Miller v. Leavenworth-Jefferson Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bride v. HeckartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. McCullough v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. In Re WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  4. Jackson Ex Rel. Warren v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  5. Parks v. Progressive Northern Insurance (In Re Hokanson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API