Schino v. Cinquini
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Merced County in proceedings supplementary to execution. E. N. Rector, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Proceedings supplemental to execution. It appears from the transcript that on January 19, 1907, plaintiff recovered judgment against defendants in the superior court for $531.25; execution issued and was returned unsatisfied; upon the affidavit of plaintiff that defendant Ansermo Cinquini had property which he refused to apply toward the payment of said judgment, the court ordered him to appear and answer concerning his property. At the hearing on May 21, 1907, one Hayes was sworn on behalf of plain tiff and testified that he was vice-president of the Hayes Company; that defendant Ansermo…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Adams v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Roberts v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re BladesIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Finn v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Oatman v. HamptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927