Marsh v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Defendant insurer appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant’s insureds, in this case involving the provisions of a homeowners insurance policy. On appeal, defendant asserts that the policy does not provide any coverage for plaintiffs’ claim. Plaintiffs cross-appeal, assigning error to the trial court’s limitation of their recovery to $5,000. We reverse on appeal and dismiss plaintiffs’ cross-appeal as moot.
Plaintiffs own a house that is insured through a policy issued by defendant. The house was constructed in 1977, and plaintiffs purchased it in 2001. Sometime in 2003 or 2004,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Mid-Century Insurance v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Denton v. International Health & Life Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Hennessy v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.