Legal Opinion

Marsh v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 14, 2009No. 051213237, A136067Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendant insurer appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant’s insureds, in this case involving the provisions of a homeowners insurance policy. On appeal, defendant asserts that the policy does not provide any coverage for plaintiffs’ claim. Plaintiffs cross-appeal, assigning error to the trial court’s limitation of their recovery to $5,000. We reverse on appeal and dismiss plaintiffs’ cross-appeal as moot.

Plaintiffs own a house that is insured through a policy issued by defendant. The house was constructed in 1977, and plaintiffs purchased it in 2001. Sometime in 2003 or 2004,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. North Pacific Insurance v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Mid-Century Insurance v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Denton v. International Health & Life Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hennessy v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API