Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Liberman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 26, 2010No. SC06-1874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that the Court accept respondent’s unconditional guilty plea and consent judgment for discipline, suspending respondent from The Florida Bar for three years. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. As more fully explained below, after consideration of the referee’s report, the guilty plea and consent judgment, and the parties’ joint response to the Court’s order to show cause why respondent should not be disbarred, we disapprove the proposed sanction of a three-year suspension and disbar respondent effective, nunc pro tunc, July…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. PahulesSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. The Florida Bar v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  3. The Florida Bar v. HeckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. The Florida Bar v. JahnSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. The Florida Bar v. Del PinoSupreme Court of Florida · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Florida Bar v. AdornoSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  2. In re VaughnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. The Florida Bar v. LibermanSupreme Court of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API