Legal Opinion

MacK v. Coker

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 9, 1974No. 1 CA-CIV 2549PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KRUCKER, Judge.

This appeal challenges the propriety of granting summary judgment in favor of the appellees for specific performance of three option argeements and denying relief to appellants on their counterclaim for slander of title. Since we are of the opinion that enforcement of the option agreements was proper, we need not address ourselves to the ruling re appellants’ counterclaim, which was predicated on the alleged non-validity of the option agreements.

The undisputed material facts are as follows. On November 2, 1971, three individual option agreements were executed by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shull v. SextonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Hofmann Company v. MeisnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Caras v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Miller v. CarmodySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  5. Hopkins v. BarlinWashington Supreme Court · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carroll v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. GutkinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Continental Life & Accident Co. v. SongerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Larson-Hegstrom & Associates, Inc. v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. McLellan v. CharlyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API