Legal Opinion

Parish v. Dee

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1958No. 7085PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

This is a negligence case. The appellee, plaintiff in the court below, sued the appellant as defendant for damages due. to personal injuries resulting from negligence charged against the appellant. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

■Three special issues were submitted to the jury concerning the appellant’s negligence. The first issue was:

“Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant, his servants or employees told Mary Ann Dee to go on the bridle path through the park?”

The jury answered it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Wichita Falls & Oklahoma Railway Co. v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Texas City Transp. Co. v. WintersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  4. Ratcliffe v. OrmsbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Nolte v. SaenzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dee v. ParishTexas Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API