Legal Opinion

Dee v. Parish

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1959No. A-7194PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

The controlling question in this case is whether the jury’s answers on which the judgment of the trial court is based are findings of ultimate or merely evidentiary facts. Mary Ann Dee, petitioner, brought the suit by her father and next friend against William Parish, respondent, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to- have been sustained when she was thrown from a horse supplied for her use by respondent. The trial court rendered judgment on the jury verdict in petitioner’s favor for $2,750.00, but a remittitur of $950.00 was later ordered and filed. This judgment has been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robert E. McKee, General Contractor v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Triangle Motors of Dallas v. RichmondTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Flanigan v. CarswellTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Wood v. Kane Boiler Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Parish v. DeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Scott v. LiebmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Henderson v. Ford Motor CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. 4front Engineered Solutions, Inc. v. Carlos Rosales, Individually, and Rosa Mejia, as Next Friend of Carlos Rosales, Jr.Texas Supreme Court · 2016

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API