Legal Opinion

Ratcliffe v. Ormsby

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1927No. 307. [fn*]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, J.

At a former day of this term an opinion was rendered in this cause affirming the judgment of the trial court on the ground that the assignments presented disclosed no error, and there was no fundamental error apparent. Upon more mature consideration of the ease on rehearing we have concluded that the transcript, without reference to the statement of facts, discloses error in the rendition of this judgment, necessitating its reversal. The original opinion will therefore be withdrawn, and this opinion on rehearing substituted therefor.

Plaintiff in error, as assignee of the Republic Rubber…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texas City Transp. Co. v. WintersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Firemen's Ins. Co. v. HavronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Neuhaus v. KainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Tripplehorn v. Ladd-Hannon Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Walling v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Universal Automobile Ins. Co. v. Morris Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API