Walsh v. Raymond
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Actioh for legal services rendered the defendant as receiver of an insolvent copartnership; brought, by appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, to the Court of Common Pleas of Fairfield County, and heard in that court before Beers, J. Facts found and judgment rendered fo* the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJ. M. Hall, J.
The defendant in this action was appointed a receiver of a copartnership by the Superior Court for Fairfield County, pursuant to the provisions of section 1316 of the General Statutes.
The finding shows that “upon the application of the plaintiff to the defendant, the plaintiff was employed by the defendant as such receiver to act as his attorney in the settlement of said estate, and the plaintiff acted in that *253capacity during a portion of the time that the estate was in the course of settlement.” The bill of particulars filed in the case shows that the plaintiff’s claim is wholly for services…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- City National Bank v. StoeckelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Hartford Federal Sayings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Kent v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.