Legal Opinion

McDermott v. McDermott

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard A. Goldberg, J.

This action for divorce raises a novel question of law concerning equitable distribution. To what extent, if at all, may a Trial Judge restrict a pensioner’s choice of options under his pension plan in order to protect the nonemployee spouse’s interest in the pension following equitable distribution?

Plaintiff and defendant are 59 and 62 years of age, respectively, and were married on November 23, 1947, at Roseland, Virginia. At the time the parties married in 1947, neither had any significant assets or income. Defendant is now a Deputy Chief of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Damiano v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Lentz v. LentzNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Perri v. PerriNew York Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Biddlecom v. BiddlecomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Blanchard v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  4. McDermott v. McDermottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API