Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McDermott v. McDermott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 14, 1986Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThompson, J.

The principal issue presented on this appeal requires us to consider whether the trial court, in the exercise of the broad *384discretion accorded to it by Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B), may limit the election by an employee spouse among alternate options available upon retirement under a public employment pension plan, and compel the employee spouse to designate irrevocably the nonemployee spouse as a beneficiary of pension benefits pursuant to the selected option. My colleagues in the majority concur in Special Term’s ruling in this case of apparent first impression in this department, that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Damiano v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Rodgers v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Vantage Petroleum, Bay Isle Oil Co., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessment Review of the Town of BabylonNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Zwingmann v. ZwingmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API