Legal Opinion

State v. Alderman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 2, 1919PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Story District Court. — E. M. Wright, Judge The defendant was convicted under an indictment charging him with willfully and unlawfully keeping whisky, and carrying it about on his person, with intent to sell the same, contrary to law. He appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

l. intoxicating LIQUORS : bootlegging: ments. ' 1. The indictment charges that,’ on or about the 6th of September, 1918, defendant did willfully, feloniously, and unlawfully keep and carry about on his person certain intoxicating liquors, to wit, whisky, with the intent then and there to sell the same, contrary to the statute, etc. This follows the language of the statute. One Carver testifies that, on September 6, 1918, he bought a bottle of whisky from defendant, and paid him for it. He testifies that defendant approached him, and said, “I know where you can get some whisky. Do you want…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barr v. NeelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. State v. DerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. State v. WrennSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Bodholdt v. TownsendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API