Legal Opinion
Barela v. Lopez
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 1966No. 7822PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOBLE, Justice.
This case has been before this court in Barela v. De Baca, 68 N.M. 104, 359 P.2d 138, and in Barela v. Lopez, 73 N.M. 121, 385 P.2d 975, and has now been appealed for the third time by Fedelina Barela from an order vacating a judgment entered October 29, 1959 in her favor against Carpió Lopez.
Fedelina Barela obtained a default judgment against Carpió Lopez for damages sustained while a passenger in an automobile owned by Willie C. De Baca and driven by Carpió Lopez. Thereafter, appellant sought to garnish Atlantic Insurance Company, asserting that Lopez was an insured…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kutz Canon Oil & Gas Co. v. HarrNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- McDonald v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Eaton Ex Rel. Estate of Montgomery v. CookeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Lucus v. RuckmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. RutledgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phoenix Funding, LLC v. Aurora Loan Services, LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
- Royal International Optical Co. v. Texas State Optical Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hanratty v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Arthur v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Apodaca v. Town of Tome Land GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.