Legal Opinion

Dye v. Mechanical Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 9, 2011No. A10A2220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

Plaintiff/appellant William G. Dye brought suit against his former employer, Mechanical Enterprises, Inc. (“MEI”) seeking to recover $127,185.91 in commissions he alleged he was owed pursuant to his contract with MEI and OCGA § 10-1-700 et seq. He also sought attorney fees and expenses of litigation. MEI answered, 1 admitting that Dye had the opportunity while employed there to earn “additional compensation” but denying that any commissions were due and owing to him. Mechanical filed a motion for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the motion following a hearing. Dye…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Arby's, Inc. v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Touche Ross & Co. v. DASD CORP.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. McLean v. Continental Wingate Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Moore v. BellSouth Mobility, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Pacrim Associates v. Turner Home Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roca Properties, LLC v. Dance Hotlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Wright v. CofieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Lufthansa Systems Infratec GmbH v. Wi-Sky Inflight, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  4. Phillips v. Adams, Jordan & Herrington, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. Carl Wright v. Charles CofieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API