Legal Opinion

Quisenberry v. Mitchell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1927No. 4425PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge HARVEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

The Honorable Court of Civil Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District has duly submitted certified questions hérein as follows:

“Certified Questions.
“To the Honorable Supreme Court of Texas:

“In this case R. G. Quisenberry and some forty-nine other citizens and alleged property holding taxpayers, filed suit in the District Court of Baylor County for an injunction to restrain the Commissioners Court of that county from using any part of the funds, derived from a sale of the bonds voted at an election…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Limestone CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Black v. StrengthTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Moore, Country Judge v. CoffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Grayson County v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Scott v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Fletcher v. ElyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Heathman v. SingletaryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Fletcher v. HowardTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Fletcher v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API