Ledbetter v. City of Topeka, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MURGUIA, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are defendants City of Topeka, Kansas, Joan Wag-non and Michele Smith’s motions to dismiss and to drop parties (Doc. 25 in 99-2489) (Doc. 24 in 99-2492). • For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motions are granted in part.
1. Background
Plaintiff filed these actions pro se, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act (VEVRA), 38…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spiess v. MeyersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Fisher v. DeCarvalhoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- Fisher v. DeCarvalhoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011