Legal Opinion

Ledbetter v. City of Topeka, Kan.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 16, 2000No. Civ. A. 99-2489-CM, 99-2492-CMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MURGUIA, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are defendants City of Topeka, Kansas, Joan Wag-non and Michele Smith’s motions to dismiss and to drop parties (Doc. 25 in 99-2489) (Doc. 24 in 99-2492). • For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motions are granted in part.

1. Background

Plaintiff filed these actions pro se, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act (VEVRA), 38…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spiess v. MeyersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  2. Fisher v. DeCarvalhoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  3. Fisher v. DeCarvalhoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API