Legal Opinion

Rowland & Sons, Inc. v. Bock

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 7, 1929No. 12673PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an action by the respondent for unpaid rent upon a •certain storehouse in the city of Sumter claimed to be due by the appellants as tenants of the respondent.

The appeal is from an order of his Honor, Judge Mauldin, striking out a part of the defendants’ answer as will be explained hereinafter.

It appears from the allegations of the complaint and answer that on May 25, 1920, a written agreement for the lease of a store building was entered into between C. G. Rowland, at that time owner of the premises, and the defendants Bock…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashe v. Car. & N. W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  2. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. Williams v. SalmondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Whitman v. CorleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  5. Mallard v. DukeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rossiter v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1953
  3. Joseph v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  4. Port Utilities Commission v. Marine Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  5. Joseph v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API