Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Bullock

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1930No. 28,180PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant Bullock appealed from an order overruling his special appearance and enjoining and restraining him from disposing of his property pending the action, and restraining defendant Strom from delivering to defendant Bullock any money or personal property which he holds and to which said Bullock is or may be entitled, and directing the payment of temporary alimony and suit money.

Plaintiff prosecutes the action for a divorce. The defendant husband is living in the state of Iowa. He owns a farm in Minnesota which is in the custody of defendant Strom, who holds money and personal property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Tyler v. Judges of Court of RegistrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Thurston v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Rhoades v. RhoadesNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McAndrews v. KrauseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Donigan v. DoniganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Humphrey v. $1109 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. McAndrews v. KrauseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API