Legal Opinion

J.I. Case Corp. v. Williams

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1992PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Chief Justice.

Permission to appeal was granted in order to review the decision of the Court of Appeals that the trial court did not have in personam jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant in this suit for the reformation of a contract between the parties. The record shows facts sufficient to support the trial court’s finding of jurisdiction.

The seller, J.I. Case Corporation (Case), d/b/a Case Power and Equipment, operates a farm equipment business in Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee. Case sells to farmers and other customers throughout the mid-South. The defendant, Earl…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Landers v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Chenault v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Gordon v. Greenview Hospital, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State of Tennessee v. NV Sumatra Tobacco Trading CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Rice v. KarschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API