Legal Opinion
Rice v. Karsch
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 16, 2006No. 03-6205PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORESTER, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal the District Court’s order granting Defendant-Appellee Michael Karsch’s motion to dismiss and denying the Plaintiffs-Appellants’ motion to amend the complaint against Karsch. Specifically, the District Court found that it did not have personal jurisdiction over Karsch and that, as a result, amending the Complaint against him would be futile. For the reasons discussed herein, the District Court will be AFFIRMED.
I. OVERVIEW
This case originates as a breach of contract for the sponsorship of an Indy Racing League race-car team. The issue…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Shrader v. BiddingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Power Invs., LLC v. SL EC, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Strabala v. ZhangDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Scott Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Eat More Wings, LLC v. Home Mkt. Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.