Legal Opinion

United States v. Edwards

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 14, 1995No. 94-0310; CMR No. 93 0252PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

WISS, Judge:

1. In United States v. Pierce, 27 MJ 367, 369 (1989), this Court held that, where an accused had received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 815, for the same offenses for which he was sentenced at trial, “an accused must be given complete credit for any and all nonjudicial punishment suffered: day-for-day, dollar-for-dollar, stripe-for-stripe.” This appeal presents the question whether, upon specific request of the defense, the military judge may apply that credit in determining the adjudged sentence or whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  2. United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. ReapCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. SouthwickCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. FusonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  3. United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  4. United States v. Private E1 ROLLAN D. MEADArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
  5. United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API