Legal Opinion
Stein v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 27, 2003No. 02 CIV. 4484(DC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHIN, District Judge.
In this putative class action, plaintiff Barbara Stein claims that the charges and disclosures in connection with a No Closing Costs Home Equity Line of Credit (“Credit Account”) issued by defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank (“JP Morgan”) violate the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and the New York State Consumer Protection from Deceptive Acts and Practices Act. N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349 (McKinney 2003). Stein believed that the daily periodic rate and annual percentage interest rate charged for any advances on her Credit Account…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Cooper v. ParskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Purgess v. SharrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Muro v. Target Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- McAnaney v. Astoria Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. MincksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- McANANEY v. ASTORIA FINANCIAL CORP.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- McAnaney v. Astoria Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.