Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

National Labor Relations Board v. Haberman Construction Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 15, 1980No. 79-1120Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRandall, Circuit Judge

I concur in parts I and II of the majority opinion but respectfully dissent with respect to the majority’s enforcement in part III of the portion of the Board’s remedial order which extends to projects not yet begun at the time of the unfair labor practices.

Issues concerning the enforceability of prehire contracts in the construction industry are some of the most difficult in the field of labor law. As the scholarly opinion of the majority demonstrates, the law bearing upon the question whether a prehire contract is enforceable with respect to future projects in a situation in which majority…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API