Legal Opinion

Rawlins v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 3, 1941No. 44995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaddeN, Judge

The question posed by the petition and the foregoing findings of fact is whether plaintiff, a naval officer of the rank of lieutenant during a portion, and lieutenant-commander during the balance, of the time in question, is entitled to the increased rental and subsistence allowances provided for by sections 4, 5, and 6 of the act of June 10, 1922, 42 Stat. 625, 627, as amended by the act of May 31, 1924, 43 Stat. 250.

Section 4 of the act provides:

That the term dependent as used in the succeeding sections of this Act shall include at all times and at all places a lawful wife, and unmarried…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Briggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  2. Rawlins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API