Legal Opinion
Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 14, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
9 N.J. 134 (1952)
87 A.2d 325
HERMAN REIMANN, INDIVIDUALLY AND FORMERLY TRADING AS OAKHURST RECREATION CENTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MONMOUTH CONSOLIDATED WATER COMPANY, A BODY CORPORATE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 4, 1952.
Decided February 14, 1952.
Mr. David Goldstein argued the cause for appellant (Mr. William Miller of the New York Bar on the brief; Messrs. Goldstein & Novogrod and Messrs. Budd & Larner, attorneys).
Mr. Sidney P. McCord, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Maurice A. Potter on the brief; Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Davis and…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Drobner v. . PetersNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brooks v. City of OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- J. H. M. Realty Corp. v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972