Legal Opinion

J. H. M. Realty Corp. v. Town of Belleville

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 4, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Certification was granted in this matter, 60 N. J. 471 (1972), and also in Brooks v. City of Orange, 60 N. J. 514 (1972), also decided this day, 61 N. J. 576, to permit consideration of the doctrine of Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co., 9 N. J. 134 (1952), and Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co., 27 N. J. 91 (1958). We are not persuaded to depart from those decisions and hence the judgment herein is affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, Justices Hall and Mountain, and Judges Conford, Sullivan and Lewis —6.

For reversal — None.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. JHM Realty Corp. v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. DingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Bongo v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  3. Weinberg v. Penns Grove Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  4. E & M Liquors, Inc. v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  5. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API