Brooks v. City of Orange
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
Certification was granted in this matter, 60 N. J. 514 (1972), and also in J. H. M. Realty Corp. v. Town of Belleville, 60 N. J. 471 (1972), also decided this day, 61 N. J. 577, to permit consideration of the doctrine of Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co., 9 N. J. 134 (1952), and Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co., 27 N. J. 91 (1958). We are not persuaded to depart from those decisions and hence the judgment herein is affirmed.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, Justices Hall and Mountain, and Judges Conford, Sullivan and Lewis —6
For reversal — None.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barkley v. Foster Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- JHM Realty Corp. v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
3Cited by12 opinions
- Weinberg v. DingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Mirza v. Filmore Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Cogliati v. Ecco High Frequency Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Barkley v. Foster Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Bongo v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.