Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Ellinwood

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 29, 1982No. D16-331, CA A22398PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Husband appeals a supplemental decree of dissolution, contending that the trial court erred in failing to cancel a contract between the parties in which he agreed to make a will leaving his property to wife. We review de novo. ORS 19.125(3).

The parties were married in 1968. The marriage was the second for husband and the third for wife. Before the marriage, the parties entered into a prenuptial agreement that provided that any property acquired by either of them before the marriage would remain as part of his or her individual estate. They intended at that time to preserve their individual…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In re the Marriage of SlausonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Florey v. MeekerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. McBain v. PrattAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In Re Estate of GoffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of Lampert Ex Rel. Thurston v. Estate of Lampert Ex Rel. StaufferAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Krize v. KrizeAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Shea v. BegleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Schaad v. LorenzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Schaad v. LorenzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API