Legal Opinion

People v. Sharrar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1910No. Docket No. 143PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Gratiot; Searl, J. George E. Sharrar was convicted of violating the local-option law, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to imprisonment for 20 days in the county jail.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Respondent was a druggist doing business at Alma, Mich. On the 2d day of October, 1908, one Simon Oberlin, a farmer who resided some five miles from Alma, delivered to the respondent a prescription signed by a physician of the city which called for 8 ounces of whisky containing 10 grains of quinine. Respondent filled the prescription, placing a label on the bottle bearing the number of the prescription and the name of the physician who prescribed, and delivered it to Oberlin. The local-option law (Act No. 207, Pub. Acts 1889) was in force in the county of Gratiot, in which the city of Alma…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. MinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Bishopp v. LaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. People v. DammMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. People v. AverillMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API